A low obligation meme
Nov. 20th, 2007 08:53 amRecently there have been a spate of "Reply to this post and I'll tell you 3 things I love about you, then post in your lj" posts, which I haven't replied to since neither part of it appeals to me (consumed as I am with hate and bile. No offense intended to those of you who aren't :)) On the whole I find those "reply to this" posts a bit scary, since there's so much baggage with replying when what I want to say is generally something tangential like "These memes are scary" or a reply to someone else's comment.
Anyway, I came up with an alternative:
Reply to this post (NOT one of the comments, or it'll all get confused) with a question. Then post a separate comment with an answer to the question immediately above yours, as a reply to the comment containing the question.
Everyone is free to answer as many questions as they feel like whether or not they post any. I guess that technically, if you want you can also post extra questions (or whatever) in the comments to other replies, but I probably will refuse to answer them on principle :P
To repeat: Each question is a separate comment to this post, with all the replies to that question being replies to that comment. You are only obliged to reply to the question posted immediately before your own (that way everyone gets at least one answer)(*)
There is no obligation to post this in your own lj(**). There is also no obligation on me to reply to any of the questions, though I probably will.
(First question is in the comments)
(*) If it assumes things that don't apply, ie you're colourblind and it asks what your favourite colour is, make up a similar question and answer that instead :)
(**)Making it a rather evolutionarily unfit meme. Especially because it turns out to be a lot harder for people to grasp than I expected (I've edited three times for clarity already)
Anyway, I came up with an alternative:
Reply to this post (NOT one of the comments, or it'll all get confused) with a question. Then post a separate comment with an answer to the question immediately above yours, as a reply to the comment containing the question.
Everyone is free to answer as many questions as they feel like whether or not they post any. I guess that technically, if you want you can also post extra questions (or whatever) in the comments to other replies, but I probably will refuse to answer them on principle :P
To repeat: Each question is a separate comment to this post, with all the replies to that question being replies to that comment. You are only obliged to reply to the question posted immediately before your own (that way everyone gets at least one answer)(*)
There is no obligation to post this in your own lj(**). There is also no obligation on me to reply to any of the questions, though I probably will.
(First question is in the comments)
(*) If it assumes things that don't apply, ie you're colourblind and it asks what your favourite colour is, make up a similar question and answer that instead :)
(**)Making it a rather evolutionarily unfit meme. Especially because it turns out to be a lot harder for people to grasp than I expected (I've edited three times for clarity already)
So....
Date: 2007-11-20 12:11 am (UTC)Re: So....
Date: 2007-11-20 12:27 am (UTC)Would you put up a cheesecake/beefcake calendar at work, and would you object if a colleague did?
Re: So....
From:Re: So....
From:Re: So....
From:Re: So....
From:Re: So....
From:Re: So....
From:Re: So....
From:Re: So....
From:Re: So....
Date: 2007-11-20 03:20 am (UTC)Re: So....
From:Re: So....
From:Re: So....
Date: 2007-11-20 04:17 am (UTC)Re: So....
Date: 2007-11-20 05:11 am (UTC)D=
D=
D=
Re: So....
Date: 2007-11-20 05:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 12:43 am (UTC)Would you put up a cheesecake/beefcake calendar at work, and would you object if a colleague did?
(No reason.)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 01:06 am (UTC)As to whether I'd object, well...I probably wouldn't like it that much, but I think it would depend on circumstances and the nature of the calender. (Also I'm pretty passive, so if they didn't respond to me complaining to them would probably just quietly seethe).
For example, my female Phd supervisor had a firemen calender in her office, and they looked really happy and healthy, and the proceeds all went to charity, so it didn't bug me (I can't speak for her male students :)) I don't think I'd mind a female version of that.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 03:09 am (UTC)How would you improve democracy?
(no subject)
From:Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ...
From:Re: Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ...
From:Re: Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ...
From:Re: Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ...
From:Re: Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ...
From:Re: Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ...
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 05:31 am (UTC)I would not object on my own behalf, but I would support (and probably even anticipate) the objections of others.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 02:06 am (UTC)But I blame my genes. Being unemotional, annoying, and overly analytical run as deeply in my family as being short, dumpy and brown-haired.
And way to give the next person a hard time answering the question without implicitly insulting me (of course, they may see this as a plus...)
*resists urge to reply with "Why is
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 04:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 04:19 am (UTC)(Mine is still "If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.")
no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 05:15 am (UTC)Two atoms/"I've lost an electron"/"sure?"/"positive!"
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 06:54 am (UTC)Other than ones already mentioned, I always liked the one at the top of this page.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 08:32 pm (UTC)*is delighted*
That's gorgeous.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 05:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 06:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 05:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 05:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 05:41 am (UTC)Masturbate while (drunk and) talking to a nightfiller.
Let their child throw off their nappy and run around the store naked.