alias_sqbr: the symbol pi on a pretty background (Default)
[personal profile] alias_sqbr
I am feeling sick and grumpy but also chatty. So, some links from [livejournal.com profile] metafandom with rambly commentary.

Failboat! The Cruise Ship of the Damned Sails On summarises a bunch of stuff.

veejane asks what sff fandom is going to do about this crap.

On safe spaces talks about, well, safe spaces.

Re the Will Shetterly/Kathyryn Cramer vs [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink thing(*): outing someone under their real name because they disagreed with you and banned you from their lj? Is unbelievably low. Dismissing the opinions of everyone who disagrees with you "because all their IPs come from Ivy league colleges"? Low and stupid. Arguing against the use of pseudonyms on the internet? Just..argh. The stupid burns.

Also, given that Worldcon is in Australia next year I find myself putting together my opinions on aussie fandom with all this stuff going on in international fandom. I feel a bit stymied about what I can do personally to try to cut down on the fail, though, apart from trying not to contribute to it myself and encouraging anti-fail.

So since [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink asked people to focus on positive things: I am currently reading "Devil in Blue Dress" by Walter Mosley after being recced it on [livejournal.com profile] 50books_poc. It is quite good, even if it's not spec fic :)

(*)People are avoiding saying their names because apparently they google stalk and harrass them, but if NOONE says their names noone will know whose been talked about. I feel too obscure to be worried, but incase they do: seriously, you're going to pick on a no-name australian rambling while sick? This will not help your PR.

Date: 2009-03-05 07:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] callistra.livejournal.com
I am *still* reading about the coffeeandink thing. Is this Racefail!09?
I am unsure what the references to RaceFail is exactly. It is a concept or an event where someone fucks up so totally embarrassingly in the internet?

Date: 2009-03-05 07:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] callistra.livejournal.com
Uh oh. Is it the Elizabeth Bear race thing?

A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-05 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com
What should SFF fandom do about all this crap? To be honest, it is about a dozen people arguing about stuff on the internet, and I don't think either side is particularly representative of fandom as a whole, or should be. I certainly think the way the specific behaviour of Will Shetterley is being taken as something that condemns all of old guard fandom to be kind of absurd, and I actually didn't even remember who Kathryn Cramer was until I googled her (oh, right, collaborates with Hartwell, NYRSF)). The behaviour of, say, Jerry Pournelle or Orson Scott Card bother me more, and I don't particularly think we should do anything about them either, other than refuse to reward being a dick by granting them attention.

And I resent having Australian debates about race turned into American ones almost as much as I resent having general old-school lit fandom judged by the obnoxious behaviour of two people. People do dumb things on the internet, and then have them blown out of proportion. That is the nature of the internet.

I personally think fighting racism is incredibly important, and their are vastly more important places to do it than within fandom.

Re: A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-06 07:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com
I do think people should not be banned from cons for acting like dicks, unless it is physical way or requires restraining orders or other things that would get them banned from anywhere. I do think people who act like dicks shouldn't be rewarded with attention, and that being a guest is about more than a persons writing -- I would seriously consider boycotting a con with OSC as a guest.

think we must be using different definitions of "fighting racism"
Sure, but it is a time and resources thing. It is not that I resent desire to the right thing, but I do get extremely annoyed that the way we deal with the issue is so inward focussed and navel-gazing. The only real way to deal with narrow ideas about race and culture within fandom is for us go out and bring something back, rather than focus our gaze more intently on each other.

Discuss racial and other subtexts in the source texts
sure, who doesn't love a little subtext. Well, actually, plenty of people aren't interested in discussing any form of subtext, be in racial, sexual, political or aesthetic, I don't think we should make them. But for those of us that do enjoy grappling with a little subtext from time to time, racial should be there.

Not ignore worthwhile works by POC
sure, but do we ignore any books by POC for that reason, or just because they aren't to our taste? I think of the works of Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle as being very 'white' in both authorship and audience, but they co-write with Steven Barnes, and the same people buy those ones too.

And yes, of course we should make our panels inclusive etc.

Also, I think literally the only jokes I have ever heard in fandom that could be considered anti-Semitic were told by Jewish people (who are notably not under-represented in fandom in my experience). I think Jewish involvement in fandom is definitely not something we need to worry unduly about (here, or in the US), they are here.

Re: A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-06 07:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com
As for letting American debates invade australian ones: I think we should be aware of american/international issues when there's going to be a lot of americans/other foreigners here, as at Worldcon.

This isn't a worldcon committee meeting. Changes to swancon need to justified in terms of swancon. We are Australians, we couldn't mimic American bias even if we tried.

Also: american online fandom may not seem very relevant to you because you're not involved in it

Well, I am slightly, but it seems primarily on the old-school side where apparently the the bad people live -- I read Making Light, I have a few friends in US fanzine fandom, etc.

on the whole I do see them as two separate but related things, both called "fandom", which sometimes overlap ie at Worldcon.
Only two? Fandom is a many-splendored thing, vast and complicated.
But yeah, traditional Worldcon lit fans can get a little curmudgeonish and defensive. All the years of eg folks saying how Worldcon gets 5,000 people and DragonCon gets 30,000 so obviously DC is taking the more correct path, etc has tended to make them a bit defensive. Traditional lit fans have to learn to accomodate the mysterious new ways of online fandom -- and on the whole, I think Swancon is doing a pretty reasonable job of that. Worldcon might not be. We can worry about that when we hold the Perth Worldcon in 2020.




Re: A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-08 10:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com
The only real way to deal with narrow ideas about race and culture within fandom is for us go out and bring something back, rather than focus our gaze more intently on each other.

I think self-criticality without expanding our perspective does nothing but maybe briefly change social mores, and doesn't really change the underlying basic issues.

I guess this is addressed more to people like me and thee, rather than those who already have a significantly different cultural perspective to draw on. But I certainly found that learning more about the lives and culture of others beyond my comfortable, highly educated white middle class background and social groups did far more to help me understand my privilege, understand issues and make me passionate about them, than any amount of confronting racial issues within fandom might have. And I think talking about that direct experience from outside fandom has probably had more useful effect in changing discussion of race within fandom than any amount of critical examination of the behaviour of my comfortable middle-class tertiary educated friends might have had.

Re: A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-09 05:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com
Sure, and lets just assume that the extremes (of do not do THIS, no do not do THIS) do not apply, and we are all people who want to address racism where ever we find it, and that that requires some sort of balance in the various ways racism is addressed, and some sort of spread of our limited resources to devote to activism. And also, that what we personally find the best way to address the issues will vary greatly based on our personal experience.

You are quite right that trying to help address racism without checking racist attitudes yourself is an issue, and you can't simply line up all injustices in order and work your way down (but rather, you have to look at both issues close to home, and the big picture). But I also know that middle class progressive activism focussing on middle class issues is a big problem to progressive movements generally, and is also a big issue in the race debate (it is certainly a big part of the debate about why white feminists don't do enough to support feminist WOC, for example). There is a balance that needs to be struck between examining racism in ourselves and our communities, and reaching out beyond the middle class oasis that is fandom. We probably differ a bit in how that balance should be struck, but we both agree it should be a balance.

As far as practicalities go, I think we differ only in one respect. You think a large time-consuming debate focussed on racism in fandom is probably a worthwhile use of fandoms collective time, I think it probably isn't. And actually, I think there are more than two sides in that debate.

Re: A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-09 10:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com
I don't see RaceFail09 as a debate
It started as one, and has now become a different one, there is certainly a debate in their somewhere. But you are right, it is has become less about race per se and more about community mores and power structures and individual people behaving like arseholes.

I think we can certainly both agree that it is a clusterfuck of bad behaviour that hasn't been particularly useful to anyone. I'd rather contain the damage and let Australian debates about race in fandom go on without being derailed by its continuing debates about the actions of individuals in US fandom.

I don't think australian fans should get involved with RaceFail09 in particular unless they're naturally involved (ie I'm in fanfic fandom, and know some of the participants personally) though it might be educational to read but not comment.
I've met the Nielsen-Haydens in person briefly, hung out at Making Light a bit off and on, have a huge amount of respect for them as (fan) writers and bloggers and editors, and I'm aware that they are among the 'bad guys' of RaceFail. FWIW, I think they said dumb things, but obviously speaking from anger and hurt at the time, and I don't particularly feel like either accusing or defending them on the specifics of RaceFail posts/actions, at least until such point as they might actually do something other than make a ranting post or two.

I think the more we can have our own debates about race in Australian fandom without replicating RaceFails poisonous dynamics the better -- and ignoring RaceFail as much as we can is a good way to start. Well, maybe not ignoring, noting it as a pattern to avoid and quietly trying to address some of the same issues in very different ways.

I also think that Worldcon attendees (australian or not) should try to avoid treating international nonwhite fans like crap
Australian fans will have their own, different biases to US ones. As one POC i heard put it "I like it here. People don't hate me because I'm black, they hate me because I'm American." We can try to change our biases a bit, but I think when it comes to relating to US fans, and understanding foreign debates about race, worldcon has to be more of a starting point rather than a destination.
And there really isn't much we (or the worldcon committee) can do about the behaviour of prominent US fans, and it is a bit presumptuous to think we can, at least without making things worse.

Which doesn't mean that we shouldn't try to have plenty of panels and discussions that address issues of race and gender and so on. I do think, however, knowing the behemoth that is worldcon, that it is pretty hard not to have such debates somewhat dominated by US viewpoints anyway. We can, and should, do what we can to have reasoned rational addressing of the issues, but there are limits to how much we can change the inherent institutional bias of worldcon. In particular, it will be very difficult to have panels that touch on RaceFail issues without major participants, or their friends/defenders/allies, wanting to weigh in.

as far as I can recall I have never heard lower class POC complain that the anti-racist movement is too focussed on the problems of middle class POC
And I always, in my head, bring this back to the central Australian indigenous experience, and I end up thinking 'well, they often don't have electricity let alone the internet, often have poor English skills, often don't have the cultural background to even understand the notion of class as we use it, why would they be heard in online debate?'. I know that reaction really is a bit unfair, but the middle class voices dominating the dialog is pretty acute in discussion of race in Australia, and online discussion of any topic always tends to being dominated by middle class privilege. Of course I'm chock full of the middle class privilege myself, no denying it, but still -- when we talk about fandom, it is not just that middle class voices dominate the debate, but also that middle class people are almost exclusively the subject of the debate as well, and it all seems a bit much to me. Maybe it is just a personal reaction.

Re: A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-09 10:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com

Is Australian fandom as bad? In amongst all the noise, it certainly seems as if we have a bit of a problem. As far as making race something we talk about, making something we address, we should do what we can to fix it by making it part of our dalog. Will it make enough of a difference? I really don't know.

I know that discussing literature and TV that doesn't come from an exclusively white UK/US POV is something I genuinely welcome -- I think it helps the racism debate, but I also seek out a lot of such work to consume for pleasure anyway. I think panels that talk about racial issues should be part of the program. I think we need to be racially sensitive in our con planning. I think, in general, we should not tolerate people being as obnoxious as the RaceFail debate.

I honestly don't know, however, if all this will make much difference to racial makeup on fandom, or really how welcoming it is to new fans. Maybe fandoms intrinsic middle-class-ness makes it intrinsically statistically whiter than the average population, and maybe the root cause of the problem is that the middle classes are disproportionately full of clueless white people. Or maybe we simply bear the historical brunt of a genre that has so far been dominated by UK and US white writers, and so we get white fans. Either of these situations would give both cause for optimism and pessimism -- pessimism that we can do much to change fandom by making it more welcoming, optimism that it will change anyway (demographic shifts due to later waves of migrants becomng middle class in the former, changes due to different patterns of media consumption in the latter).

Re: A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-08 03:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephiepenguin.livejournal.com
I personally think fighting racism is incredibly important, especially within the spaces where racism is an issue (like, for example, fandom).

Re: A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-08 08:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com
Its my bias from the central Australian experience. Racism is nowhere near an issue in fandom to the extent that it is an issue in Alice Springs, seriously, and having recent experience of ugly unpleasant brutal overt racism makes it much harder for me to be alarmed by the whiteness of fandom. Given the choice between racism in fandom (that mostly seems to make some people upset or uncomfortable in some social events), and the sort of racism that makes people die decades earlier than the national average, I find it hard to justify to myself spending too much time and effort trying to fight the former that could be spent fighting the latter.

Of course, this is only a valid argument from me if I am spending time and effort on the latter, which I currently am not as much as I feel I should be. And it is an argument from my point of view, which is to say from someone who doesn't experience racism directly — I'd certainly be more inclined to fight racism that was directed against me personally.

This doesn't mean that I think racism in fandom should be ignored, but I think more in terms of trying to do what we do in a less racist way, rather than spending a whole lot of effort on the issue directly. I'm happy to talk about race in fannish discussions, happy to read fiction from other cultural viewpoints, happy to make addressing issues of race one of the many issues we deal with in planning fannish things. But I'm not really inclined to see large time-consuming debates about the issue, often (not always, but often) very inward looking and very focussed on the attitudes of other people already within fandom, as being something I think is a particularly valuable use of my time.
Maybe it would be more of an issue if I felt a target of racism within fandom personally.

I think if we care about issues of racism, then if we focus ourselves on fighting racism and addressing our own biases in more outgoing ways, and in ways more connected with general society than fandom, and bring that experience back to fandom, not only is it pretty that we will we have done more good in the long run, but we will probably end up doing at least as much to fight racism within fandom as well. Maybe this reasoning only applies to people who have less direct experience of racism personally -- but I also think fandom is pretty focussed on middle-class issues even from those who do have direct experience of racism.

Which isn't to say I have any issue with someone being interested in the issues — there is plenty to talk about, plenty of interesting debate to be had, plenty of value to be had from challenging ourselves, plenty of ways in which we can change our culture to be a little less blind on the issues. But I think the issues are more to be explored and quietly addressed, rather than urgently to be confronted. I have other issues to do with race I'd rather be urgently confronting.


Re: A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-09 03:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com
Do not tell someone who experiences racism that it's not that big of a deal, or imply that them focussing on it is somehow selfish or insular.
I specifically said it was I was speaking from my position as someone who doesn't experience racism, and that I'd feel differently (and by implication act differently) if I did. And I meant that. I'm certainly not arguing that focussing on racism that affects you personally is in anyway wrong -- that would be both callous and pointless. And I also made it explicit that my greater interest in focussing on central Australian issues than fannish ones is a result of my personal experience, and I put most of the arguments specifically in terms of what I personally thought was worthwhile for me, and please don't try to deny the validity of my personal experience, thanks.

I do think that focussing on racism in fandom will always be the middle class focussing on the issues that effect the middle class. And while I acknowledge that people will always want to focus on issues that effect them and this personal connection to the issues is vital, and while there is no perfect answer to the general issue of the progressive middle class focussing on the issues that effect the progressive middle class (and there has always got to be some appropriate balance, these issues can never be ignored), I do think it is a big problem with progressive movements generally, and I'm hardly alone in this, and focussing on issues within fandom seems to pretty clearly be an example.

And I certainly have personally experienced the way being middle class can focus you on issues that effect the middle class (given my past in student politics and my work with the EFA, you could argue that its pretty much all my activist activity so far) and I, personally, am trying to break out of that. I'm not arguing that everyone else should, just being curmudgeonly about having my attention dragged back to my own backyard.

Re: A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-10 05:01 am (UTC)
ext_6167: (kiowa dawn)
From: [identity profile] delux-vivens.livejournal.com
Given the choice between racism in fandom (that mostly seems to make some people upset or uncomfortable in some social events),

Really?

but I also think fandom is pretty focussed on middle-class issues even from those who do have direct experience of racism.

Again I say. Really?

Re: A burst of predictable curmudgeonry

Date: 2009-03-10 04:59 am (UTC)
ext_6167: (Default)
From: [identity profile] delux-vivens.livejournal.com
To be honest, it is about a dozen people arguing about stuff on the internet,

There's a few more than that.

And I resent having Australian debates about race turned into American ones

There's more than a few Australian people commenting.

I personally think fighting racism is incredibly important, and their are vastly more important places to do it than within fandom.

Except it would be really nice if there was less racist imagery from places like scifi writing and its adaptations.

Profile

alias_sqbr: the symbol pi on a pretty background (Default)
alias_sqbr

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 09:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios