Cracky Unoriginal "Elementary" Theory
Jan. 17th, 2013 02:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Irene is Moriarty.
Sherlock found her interesting which means she must be hella weird.
Narrative causality means she's alive: anyone mentioned that often should at least get a flashback or something. If she's alive she must at the very least be in cahoots with Moriarty, and being the same person is more interesting.
Moriarty has never tried to kill Sherlock.
Irene "died" like all of M's other victims, meaning all Sherlock would have found is a pool of her blood. So all she had to do was store up her blood a little at a time in a freezer (EDIT: Apparently this wouldn't work in real life, see the comments. Does tend to work in TV land though...) Maybe faking her own death was the whole point of the exercise, a distinctive method of death which often leaves no corpse but allows for definite identification of the victim.
And if she is coming back and there is going to be complicated black romance between her and Sherlock then it's definitely better there be no romantic relationship between Sherlock and Joan, or there'd be an icky "women fighting over a man" vibe, rather than "woman trying to protect her platonic male friend from his TERRIBLE ex". Thus the creators' insistence that Joan/Sherlock isn't going to be a thing.
One thing that confuses me about Moriarty is why they didn't predict Sherlock talking to Moran long enough to realise it was all a setup. And if Moriarty did predict it, what was the point? To get rid of a henchman who'd passed their usefulness and mess with Sherlock's head? I guess we'll see!
And now I wait for tomorrow's episode to totally prove me wrong.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 06:47 am (UTC)Moriarty might not have expected Moran to talk, but even so, there'd still be clues in his silence or death.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 11:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 11:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 11:53 am (UTC)Exactly! And quite subtly, too, took me a while to think about it that way.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 07:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 08:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 12:19 pm (UTC)Blood that's been frozen and thawed causes ice crystals to form in the cells, and that - under a microscope - shows clear signs of damage to the cells (kind of how freezing meat can change the texture and taste of a meat, which his due to the ice crystals of the water in cells actually damaging and destroying the cell walls and tissues as they form). Even if it's frozen well (i.e. cryogenically), signs of freezing can still be noticeable.
And both of those things are visible under a microscope, unfortunately. I mean, shows have done it before, you know, I think I've seen it in a Law & Order or an SVU, but it's one of those moments where it's like 'uh oh, didn't consult with forensics' or 'uh oh, hoping the audience didn't pick that one up.' And you know, a lot of shows do that to their audience (except maybe Bones, who actually have some pretty good scientific / forensic consultants, given the incredulity of some of their death scenes), so it wouldn't be entirely *surprising* if Elementary did it - they'd be joining a long line of procedurals who have done just that.
I guess I just, personally, would be disappointed. One of the things I love about Elementary is that Gregson and his team actually seem to be really on the ball, intelligent and able to also solve cases alongside Sherlock, rather than being entirely dependent on him? And I was hope that sort of scriptwriting / plot courtesy would also extend to the crew/s at Scotland Yard in the UK. /raaaamble.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 11:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 07:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 08:10 am (UTC)The pool of blood thing is definitely an interesting theory (that it was faked), but it would be disappointing personally, since forensically stored blood is easy to pick up on, almost ridiculously so - it only needs to be shoved under a microscope, something I'm almost certain Sherlock or Scotland Yard would have done themselves in the process of checking it was actually her blood. So... oh man, I'd be so disappointed if that were the case. If she's alive, I hope they think of a more creative way of explaining the pool of her blood on the floor (i.e. that she did actually bleed out, but was immediately transfused with stored blood, or that she was placed in an ice bath and transfused, that kind of thing).
And I wonder how much they're following the commonly accepted psychology of Moriarty that he is generally bored with life since he knows so much, and perhaps got bored of Sherlock not knowing who he was. Not sure there. Be interesting to see what happens next episode, and indeed for the back seven. I'm really enjoying this season so far.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 11:57 am (UTC)he is generally bored with life since he knows so much, and perhaps got bored of Sherlock not knowing who he was
That would make sense! The trail had gotten cold so Moriarty decided to liven things up.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 12:50 pm (UTC)But they've seemed trope-aware enough up until now -- and, likewise, misogyny-aware -- that I'm kind of hoping that they've got a way of doing "she's not dead" that's going to be worth it? (Not placing money on it or anything. Just... hoping.)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 12:52 pm (UTC)Yes, I'm hoping whatever they do, they make it work. I have been refreshed and pleasantly surprised by the willingness of the scriptwriters in this to be quite mature and make mature choices (and the actors / director etc. too), and it's quite unlike many procedurals I've seen as a result. So fingers crossed? Much with the hoping. :)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 01:21 pm (UTC)This is one of the main motivations behind me coming up with the theory.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-18 09:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-19 05:11 am (UTC)