Active Entries
- 1: Media and Power: 01 Unit 1: Construction of Meaning: Picture Composition
- 2: Some Puzzle-y Games I Have Played Lately
- 3: Historical games about not being violent
- 4: Random Life Update
- 5: Media and Power: Introduction
- 6: Curious what the scam is with a real estate "letter" we got
- 7: Art Prompts For Visibly Fat or Muscular Humanoid Characters
- 8: So I broke my toe
Style Credit
- Base style: Tabula Rasa
- Theme: Muted by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-11-10 02:14 am (UTC)It's because it's less of a grey area, legally. Fan art - especially non-photomanip art done of live-action characters - is seen as non-deriviative work, because doing a painting of Spock is similar to doing a portrait of a random person who happens to be an actor who played the part of Spock. And there's no law against painting portraits of random people.
Writing a fanfic "portrait" of a character, on the other hand, is seen by some as a "derivative work" (and thus illegal under Copyright law) while it's seen by others as a "transformative work" (and thus legal under Copyright law) but even when it's transformative, the legal protection of the fan writer is greater when they don't make money from it. So it's basically safer for everyone if fanfic writers don't try to sell their work.