alias_sqbr (
alias_sqbr) wrote2009-01-31 09:15 pm
Entry tags:
Maybe it's because I have a headache
But doesn't this kinda invalidate this ?
EDIT: Not if the "original" aspects of the movie were stolen. Still, I would think the ABC article might at least mention the original short story.
In related news: "Speed racer" is a riot of colour, and I mean "riot" in the "violent smashing things" sense. Ow.
EDIT: Not if the "original" aspects of the movie were stolen. Still, I would think the ABC article might at least mention the original short story.
In related news: "Speed racer" is a riot of colour, and I mean "riot" in the "violent smashing things" sense. Ow.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Now that would be funny :)
no subject
no subject
And I beleive it's at most 50 years copyright, so it would have been out of copyright in '71. Unless there was a renewal.
If there wasn't, then the story is public domain, and regardless of similarities to a '94 story of a similar nature, they can claim (and have) that the inspiration is the '21 story that may have been the inspiration of the '94 story also.
Yay for copyrights...
no subject
Currently the Sonny Bono act extended copyright another 20 years, to 70 years after authors death, or 120 years for corporate ownership. This currently makes anything from 1923 on copyright, so long as a legitimate copyright existed in 1998 when the act was created.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Bono_Copyright_Term_Extension_Act
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Speed and Trixie are also eye candy.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I've just come up with the best way to make a living: write crap short stories on absolutely every topic I can think of, mail them off to hollywood, and then demand royalties for every movie made henceforth.
no subject